What Roads Would Be Repaired With New Tax

Route Conditions and Spending by State: Does More Money Mean Better Roads?

Final Updated: 11/3/2021

Advertising & Editorial Disclosure

Quality Verified

Featured Expert s

While state and local governments spend billions each yr on route maintenance and operations, a new analysis from MoneyGeek suggests taxpayers are not necessarily getting their money's worth. At best, they are getting just enough road investment to maintain the electric current status of roads, only not enough to improve them.

Central Findings:

Roughly 1 in every ten miles of road in the United States is in poor condition.
Rhode Isle and California were u.s. ranked worst for road roughness, with forty% and 37% of roads in poor condition, respectively.
Idaho and New Hampshire had the least rough roads and spent some of the lowest in majuscule outlay per mile ($6.32 and $8.61, respectively).
States generally spend in proportion to how much their roads are utilized, reflecting the need to address wear and tear and how roads are funded — typically via gas taxes.
Yet, how much each land spends on roads has no correlation with road quality subsequently adjusting for vehicle miles.

Roughest Roads and Infrastructure Spending past State

Moneygeek analyzed overall route quality and the investment levels per lane mile in every state and found that more spending on roads did not necessarily lead to better road quality.

The route roughness index is the weighted average value of the observed measurements of the state'south international roughness index (IRI). The Federal Highway Administration indicates that an IRI mensurate of less than 95 indicates a route in proficient condition, between 95 and 170 is adequate, and greater than 170 is poor. For case, California'due south roughness index score of 144 means that the state's route weather are borderline acceptable as an average. In reality, 37% of California's roads are considered to exist in poor condition, and the state ranks third in the country for worst route conditions, behind simply Washington, D.C. and Rhode Island.

Country	Road Roughness Rank (#1 = Worst)	Road Roughness Index	% Poor Condition	% Good Condition	Capital Outlay Rank	Uppercase Outlays per Lane Mile	Total Highway Spend ($Ms)
Commune of Columbia	1	214.9	80%	2%	one	$131.29	$611
Rhode Island	two	147.4	xl%	24%	6	$33.35	$655
California	3	143.eight	37%	24%	fifteen	$eighteen.xc	$19,310
Hawaii	4	143.1	31%	25%	3	$38.59	$830
Nebraska	5	137.6	32%	33%	45	$4.44	$1,742
Wisconsin	half dozen	137.0	28%	24%	21	$xi.74	$4,743
New York	vii	132.6	29%	33%	5	$36.68	$14,151
Massachusetts	8	130.4	31%	36%	fourteen	$19.74	$3,242
New Jersey	nine	129.7	29%	42%	iv	$36.76	$5,102
Michigan	ten	127.i	25%	37%	35	$7.50	$5,270
Washington	11	120.7	22%	40%	18	$13.81	$iv,678
Pennsylvania	12	120.0	21%	41%	eight	$29.xiv	$11,256
Illinois	13	118.5	19%	41%	nineteen	$xiii.30	$vii,492
Colorado	14	118.0	xviii%	41%	32	$eight.15	$3,270
New Mexico	xv	116.ix	22%	44%	48	$three.57	$1,011
Louisiana	sixteen	116.6	23%	33%	27	$9.46	$2,229
Texas	17	115.3	19%	43%	10	$26.89	$24,247
Iowa	eighteen	113.6	eighteen%	40%	39	$6.62	$2,943
Ohio	19	112.2	20%	49%	17	$13.96	$6,057
Montana	20	111.half dozen	19%	50%	50	$3.04	$963
Indiana	21	109.2	14%	45%	28	$9.41	$3,286
S Dakota	22	108.vii	fifteen%	43%	49	$3.xvi	$985
Maryland	23	107.3	nineteen%	55%	9	$27.70	$3,733
Connecticut	24	107.i	xv%	49%	11	$23.55	$2,097
Virginia	25	106.7	12%	48%	16	$17.25	$v,443
Due north Dakota	26	105.0	sixteen%	51%	47	$four.15	$one,240
Mississippi	27	104.4	sixteen%	53%	43	$5.37	$1,742
Southward Carolina	28	104.0	11%	48%	31	$8.58	$two,277
Arkansas	29	103.7	13%	49%	46	$4.21	$one,685
Oregon	30	103.3	13%	51%	42	$v.39	$2,313
Delaware	31	101.0	xi%	52%	2	$38.94	$817
Maine	32	97.7	fifteen%	55%	38	$half dozen.70	$918
Wyoming	33	91.6	12%	54%	41	$5.46	$669
West Virginia	34	91.two	11%	56%	24	$10.39	$1,538
North Carolina	35	89.7	eight%	56%	12	$21.19	$6,610
Kentucky	36	89.5	eight%	61%	33	$8.09	$two,248
Missouri	37	89.3	10%	64%	44	$4.61	$2,590
Utah	38	88.nine	vi%	62%	20	$11.75	$2,174
Minnesota	39	88.6	7%	63%	25	$10.00	$5,040
Alaska	40	87.2	half dozen%	63%	xiii	$19.82	$1,317
Kansas	41	86.two	9%	64%	51	$2.96	$1,707
Nevada	42	85.9	8%	61%	22	$xi.08	$1,950
Vermont	43	83.0	6%	66%	29	$9.32	$648
Tennessee	44	eighty.4	8%	67%	36	$7.39	$2,718
Arizona	45	79.seven	10%	45%	23	$11.03	$2,801
Oklahoma	46	78.nine	xi%	35%	34	$viii.00	$2,826
Georgia	47	78.ane	4%	72%	26	$nine.54	$4,459
Florida	48	78.0	5%	70%	seven	$29.70	$12,143
Alabama	49	74.990	7%	75%	37	$7.20	$ii,851
New Hampshire	l	74.five	viii%	74%	30	$8.61	$775
Idaho	51	59.3	7%	41%	40	$6.32	$i,148

Human relationship Between Country Spending And Road Weather

Analysis of all 50 states shows that states generally spend proportionately to the vehicle miles traveled; however, at that place are exceptions. Texas, New York and Pennsylvania all spend proportionately more than the vehicle miles traveled, and California spends less. Regardless of how much money they spend on road conditions, states are using available funds to maintain, not fix or improve, aging roads.

Later on adjusting for vehicle miles, there is no correlation betwixt spending and road conditions. If states were working to improve their roads, the worse the roads, the more than the state would exist spending (to gear up them). Additionally, tax-friendly states don't have the worst roads. They are trying to go along roads in working order simply as states with college taxes are.

Who Pays For Roads?

Three-quarters of spending to maintain and fix roads and highways comes from state and local governments. According to the Urban Institute, the average state spends nearly 8% of its budget on roads. The rate of investment has not changed much over time. In 1977, 8% of country and local budgets combined went toward roads and highways compared with 6% in 2022.

Through the Highway Trust Fund (HTF), the federal authorities provides grants to states to maintain and meliorate the Interstate Highway System. Funded by transportation-related taxes such as gasoline and diesel taxes, the HTF spends more than than it raises in acquirement. According to the Congressional Budget Part (CBO), the fund ran a $xvi billion arrears in 2022. The CBO's projections predict that the fund, which has relied on transfers from general revenue enhancement funds since 2008, will exist depleted by 2023.

Expert Console: The Economic Impact of Road Improvements and Neglect

How is highway improvement usually funded?
What is the impact of investment in road improvement? What are the implications when states do non invest in such improvements?
How practise poor roads impact drivers?
Are there broader impacts of poor roads on communities or local economies?
Would COVID-19 Infrastructure spending be an effective economic stimulus?
Is there anything yous'd like to add about the relationship betwixt the quality of roads, state budgets and state or local economical indicators?

James Golden

Founder and CEO

Murray Rowden

Americas Managing Manager & Global Head of Infrastructure at Turner & Townsend

Jerry Wilson

Chief Editor at Complete Auto Guide

Why Are Roads in Proficient Repair Of import?

Quality roads and highways are essential to the broader U.S. economic system. Most consumer goods travel along the nation's highways, and investing to improve roads has historically boosted economic growth. Especially during pandemic-related economic setbacks, such infrastructure investment could create much-needed jobs and help people financially. For case, poor road weather translate directly into higher auto repair and maintenance costs, along with a harder time finding inexpensive auto insurance for consumers.

Methodology

MoneyGeek adamant how states rank on the condition of their roads and their highway infrastructure spending by comparing the roughness measure out of each land's urban and suburban highways and state and local (municipal and county) government expenditures on their highway system. We used the metrics below to establish concluding scores and rankings:

Road Roughness Alphabetize: Nosotros adult a composite roughness score of all major urban roadways in each state by weighting each category of measured pavement roughness and aggregating this information across the entire state organisation.
Percentage Poor vs. Good Status: We designated each category of measured pavement roughness into larger groupings and compared the number of lane miles across the country past groupings of higher and lower pavement roughness.
Uppercase Outlays per Lane Mile: This value is calculated as the full state expenditure on uppercase outlays for highways divided by the full lane miles in each state's functional road system.
Total Highway Spend: This value is calculated as the total country expenditure on both upper-case letter outlays and other expenditures for highways.

About the Author